Sunday, February 24, 2019
Is the film version of ââ¬ËOf Mice and Menââ¬â¢ inferior to the original novel Essay
Of Mice and Men was written in 1937 during the great depression, by hind end Steinbeck.Steinbeck was born in 1902 in California some of his different overbolds are The Red Pony, Cup of Gold, To a God Unknown, In enigmatic Battle, Canary Row, Sweet Thursday and motley others. After months of ill health, John Steinbeck died of heart failure in December 1968 and is buried in Salinas, California.The delineation was directed by Gary Sinise, and runs for approximately 115 minutes and was made in the USA.Of Mice and Men is suitable for adaptation as the plot line is non too complicated and the prognosiss will be relatively easy to make, on the other hand there are several problems, a various descend of the scenes in the playscript female genitalsnot be adapted for the ingest, such as when Lennie hallucinates by the river.The opening sequence opens with George and Lennies escape from Weed, this is set in a big open field, with vibrant colours this will shell the earreachs atten tion as vibrant colours give the impression of danger. The television camera starts of in a long shot, this is consequential as it give tongue tos the audience her ripped dress, because the camera zooms in to a close up to show the divide and fear on her memorial tablet. The opening in the make is much to a greater extent than outstanding to the atomic number 53 of the novel, the director choose the include this section because it gives a contrast from George being in a combined place on the train, to having dramatic colours and wide open space, this makes the dart more dramatic and exciting for the audience.In the novel Curleys wife and Curley are never seen together, they are evermore looking for each other, the incident with Crooks is not included. In the charge Curleys wife does not have red mules, and is not heavily made up, she is wearing white and pink this gives her the look of muliebrity and innocence, which will give a different portrayal of the cause to th e novel.She is always seen in doorways, for example when she sees George, the camera uses a mid shot so the audience can see both their reactions, Curleys wife is looking alfresco want she is looking out for Curley, she is giving him no eye come to this shows us that she is not trying to lead him on. George is giving her eye contact, this ability be making her note nervous as she starts the fiddle with her dress. In the novel she is shown as being a dangerous, flirty pillowcase whereas in the film she is made to be totally different, the director has chosen to portray her empathetically this is because this will enforce more of a reaction when she dies, this makes the audience sense of smell sympathy for her.George and Lennie are presented with more sympathy in the film than the novel, the novel is less extreme. When Lennie has the fight with Curley the camera is in mid shot and Lennie is seated down, this makes him look more vulnerable. The director uses a strong use of un decomposed in the scenes of the fight, the punches are made to sound loud, this can make the audience relate to Lennie.A close up is then on Georges face to show his concern for Lennie, then a extreme close up of Lennie is used, this is very dramatic way of showing a characters emotions, the audience can see Lennies angry eyes and almost makes the audience feel scared as he has blood on his face when he is breaking Curleys hand, this makes the film superior the reading the novel as the camera shots and sound can make more of an effect on the audience and makes Lennie and George more three dimensional, whereas the novel makes them seem more one dimensional.The beginning of the novel is very different as Steinbeck sets the scene in clear detail, he creates a peaceful atmosphere by utilize nature the leaves lie so deep and so crisp that a lizard makes a great skittering if he runs among them. Unlike the novel the film shows an exciting and tense atmosphere.At the beginning of the film the director chooses to show George on a train, this scene is not included in the book because it would only work in a film, the director uses a haunting shilling melody lingering in the background, the camera shot focuses on a lonely figure crouched in the corner. By using this scene at the beginning it grabs the audiences attention and a invigorate mood is set in the audience, he sets a stark contrast between that scene and the one that follows. This scene shows George sitting in the dark, which shows more about him than in the novel it shows that George is in the dark. The film relates to Steinbeck descriptive prose well, notwithstanding some scenes could have been presented more like the book.In my opinion the film does do the film justice, tho some characters could have been presented more like the characters in the book, for example Curleys wife, she is presented to be a flirty and dangerous character in the book and presented as a feminine vulnerable character in the fil m. The scenes are set in different ways but are successful in giving the audience the same amount of emotion as in the novel. The scenes that are in the novel that are not included in the film are not important and they are replaced with scene of the same importance that are easier to make. Overall the film is a good adaptation of the novel.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment