Ethics of Native American Mascots Essay

morals of inherent American mascots is a controversial result and should non be argued against because they ar used ethic all in ally, complementary, and noticefully. The ingrained American Mascot controversy is a topic that has presented itself in recent years all across the country. Though in that respect energise been some issues, complaints, and moral questions brought up nigh the indispensable American mascot dilemma by a minority group of people, there is no certain rail counselling line to wherefore these mascots should be banned.Ethically, there is nothing upon with using natural American images as mascots. indigen American mascots atomic number 18 honorable. moral philosophy is defined as a administration of moral principles and rules, the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a special(prenominal) sort taboo of human actions or a let outicular group or culture, and also a branch of philosophy dealing with determine relating to human conduct, w ith respect to the rightness and inappropriateness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of much(prenominal) actions (dictionary. com).Native American mascots and watchword for sports leagues has been a debate dating back as far as the late sixties (Oguntoyinbo 2011). When talking roughly the ethics perspective of the argument, calling the images and logotypes unethical toward Native Americans is wrong because ethics, like the definition narrates, portrays to respect and class toward a group or culture. The purpose of mascots is to believe in something, to vex a logo that brings teams and communities together for troth in sports, and to perform well and do your best so you stand tallish and proud to be a part of your team and mascot.To be a warrior on a football field and literally have the warrior emblem, to be a brave, or the head words and represent honor, courage, and bravery would be astonishing. Native American mascots argon co mplementary. The use of logos as mascots is to honor Native Americans, they ar not used to offend, and they are not misguiding (King 2002). Though there are 2 slopes to every argument, when a mascot is called degrading or any negative term novel(prenominal) than complementary, it must have something border rootage if not over the top loathly on it. There is no legitimate argument for why an arrowhead on the typeface of afootball helmet, a logo of a Native American chiefs head on the side of a school or heretofore a cut on a basketball jersey is macrocosm reverted to as degrading, but the controversy still continues. approximately name calling can be vile such(prenominal) as Redmen, Savages, etc. moreover if it is the name itself that offends, it needs to be argued that counseling and not toward the Native American mascot as a figure. Arguing a mascot as degrading when really it is meant the name is immodest in itself because a mascot is a symbol of a team, not the name it is also the strength and core of a team.Mascots are purposely portrayed as be ethical, complementary, and respectful, in fact tribal names find their way onto all kinds of consumer products, such as the Jeep Cherokee and the Dodge Dakota. For the akin reason, Indian images appear on U. S. currency, such as the old Indian-head nickel and the new Sacajawea dollar. The Army even names its helicopters by and by common peoples the Apache Longbow, the Kiowa Warrior, the Comanche, and the Blackhawk. If we were to let the minority side of this argument change Native American mascots, because a number of cities (e.g. , Chicago, Miami, and Milwaukee), plus most half the states, would have to be renamed (Miller 2001). Mascots are symbols, symbols of spirit, and symbols of strength. Native American mascots are respectful. The minority of people who argue this issue urgency these mascots to change because they believe that Native American mascots are disrespectful to Native Americ ans, they are portrayed disrespectfully, and everything about the mascot is portrayed disrespectful. many even say that teams with Native American mascots do whats called a tomahawk whoop that supposedly represent Indian culture and meant for honoring them but thats not true (Pewewardy 2000). Doing a tomahawk chop is in no way disrespectful, in fact, a tomahawk chop is used to pump up the crowd, its used to respect the heritage of the Native American, and its used to continue tradition. macrocosm a part of a Native American mascot team, chances are the intent is to hope to represent that logo and be the uppermost respectful possible toward the heritage that the symbol represents.It is amazing how some can say that Native American mascots are disrespectful. A huge reason that Florida State University got to grip their symbol and logo the Seminoles is because the chief of the Seminole tribe in Florida strongly supports what Florida State does with the symbol and how it is respect ed. Disrespect is when a team of any name burns a mascot logo before a game, disrespect is when a sports game is not played by the rules, disrespect is when refusal to shake and opp geniusnts hand aft(prenominal) a lost battle, not a logo that represents pride and respect for a team, school, and community.Ethics of Native American mascots is a controversial topic and should not be argued against because again they are not being used unethically, they are not degrading, and they are not being used disrespectfully. Schools shouldnt have to change their mascot because a some minority people give speeches, relieve letters to the NCAA, or even defy about it. It should come down to what the tribes themselves emergency they are the ones with their image portrayed out there as mascots.That would be the ethical and right way to go about this controversy. Ethics can play a big role when it comes to the Native American mascot issue. No matter which side is elect to debate, ethics should a lways be considered one of, if not, the top motivation. Works Cited Definition of ethics. Ethics definition. Dictionary. com. Web. 15 November 2011 King, Richard. Defensive dialogues Native American mascots, anit-Indianism, and educationalinstitutions. donnish Search Premier. Simile, February 2002. Web. 27 November 2011. Miller, John. Whats in a (Team) Name? Academic Search Premier. National Review, 16 April 2001. Web. 15 November 2011. Oguntoyinbo, Lekan. The Name Game. Academic Search Premier. versatile Issues in Higher Education, 28 April 2011. Web. 15 November 2011.. Pewewardy, Cornel. Why Educators Should Not Ignore Indian Mascots. Academic Search Premier. Multicultural Perspectives, 2000. Web. 27 November 2011.